🌀Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita and Plurality

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

The ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita are related to Plurality in the cognitive sense. Gendlin verbalized Focusing and Jiro Kawakita verbalized the KJ method. However, they are not communicated to those who have not had these experiences. This is also true for Plurality. It is thought that the only way to transfer tacit knowledge is through collaboration.

Gendlin's process of experience and the implicit combine with context to create meaning. These ideas and Plurality are deeply related. In WHY I AM A PLURALIST, the connection between epistemological pluralism and linguistic Plurality is noted.

Nishio's research note, "Plurality and the Polis Study Group," states that plurality, in the sense of diversity, may be a framework for further discussion among people with interests or expertise in a particular topic.

Thinks deeply

The relevance of Gendlin's and Jiro Kawakita's ideas to Plurality needs to be considered more deeply. We should also explore specific ways in which experience and tacit knowledge that cannot be verbalized can be communicated through collaboration.

- What perspectives are needed to deeply understand Plurality?

- What are the specific methods of communicating tacit knowledge through collaboration?

- How can we share experiences that cannot be verbalized?

- How exactly should we understand the connection between epistemic pluralism and linguistic plurality as pointed out in "WHY I AM A PLURALIST"?

- How should we understand the Plurality framework described in Nishio's research note "Plurality and the Polis Study Group"?

In "Broad Listening," it is stated that "better consensus building" can be achieved by augmenting "the ability to recognize the opinions of the many." However, mastering the practical techniques of broad listening remains a challenge.

In "Kozaneba:Plurality" it is stated that "intelligence, not knowledge, is trusted as the environment changes faster." He also mentions "Plurality: Technology for Collaborative Diversity and Democracy - RadicalxChange.

In "Plurality and the Polis Study Group," it is stated that plurality, in the sense of diversity, may be a framework for further discussion among people with interests or expertise in a particular subject.

extra info

generated: 2023-09-03 07:41

previous notes

🤖🔁Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita with Plurality

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

The ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita are related to Plurality in the cognitive sense; Plurality is a concept that must be understood from a variety of perspectives, including broad listening and epistemological pluralism. Gendlin verbalized Focusing through the practice of psychotherapy, and Jiro Kawakita verbalized Thinking Fireworks through the practice of a technique called the KJ method. However, verbal transmission of these experiences to those who have not had them cannot be conveyed. This is also true for Plurality, and Polanyi's tacit knowledge returns, but it cannot be communicated linguistically. The only way to transmit tacit knowledge may be through collaboration.

Gendlin's process of experience and the implicit combine with context to create meaning. These ideas and Plurality are deeply related. In WHY I AM A PLURALIST, the connection between epistemological pluralism and linguistic Plurality is noted.

Nishio's research note, "Plurality and the Polis Study Group," states that plurality, in the sense of diversity, may be a framework for further discussion among people with interests or expertise in a particular topic. I feel this is deeply relevant to my research.

Thinks deeply

The relevance of Gendlin's and Jiro Kawakita's ideas to Plurality needs to be considered more deeply. We should also explore specific ways in which experience and tacit knowledge that cannot be verbalized can be communicated through collaboration.

- What perspectives are needed to deeply understand Plurality?

- What are the specific methods of communicating tacit knowledge through collaboration?

- How can we share experiences that cannot be verbalized?

- How exactly should we understand the connection between epistemic pluralism and linguistic plurality as pointed out in "WHY I AM A PLURALIST"?

- How should we understand the Plurality framework described in Nishio's research note "Plurality and the Polis Study Group"?

extra info

generated: 2023-08-31 21:34

previous notes

🤖🔁Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita with Plurality

The ideas of Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita are related to Plurality in the cognitive sense; Plurality is a concept that requires understanding from a variety of perspectives, including broad listening and epistemological pluralism. By integrating these perspectives, a deeper understanding can be achieved.

Gendlin verbalized Focusing through the practice of psychotherapy, and Jiro Kawakita verbalized Thinking Fireworks through the practice of a technique called the KJ method. However, verbal communication to those who have not had these experiences will not get the message across. This is also true for Plurality, and Polanyi's tacit knowledge returns, but it cannot be communicated linguistically. The only way to transmit tacit knowledge may be through collaboration.

Gendlin's process of experience and the implicit combine with context to create meaning. These ideas and Plurality are considered deeply related.

In WHY I AM A PLURALIST, the connection between epistemological pluralism and linguistic plurality is noted.

Oriental values

Japanese cultural trends and their relationship to Plurality

Plurality of words

religious pluralism

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

The ideas of Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita are related to Plurality in the cognitive sense. It exists at the intersection of philosophers who eschew physics and psychology and the Japanese cultural tendency toward consensus-oriented, top-down decision making.Plurality is a concept that requires understanding from a variety of perspectives, including broad listening and epistemological pluralism. Integrating these perspectives provides a deeper understanding.

Gendlin verbalized Focusing through the practice of psychotherapy, and Jiro Kawakita verbalized Thinking Fireworks through the practice of a technique called the KJ method. However, verbal transmission of these experiences to those who have not had them cannot be conveyed. This is because Polanyi's tacit knowledge returns "Yes" to Plurality as well, but cannot be communicated linguistically. It is thought that the only way to transmit tacit knowledge is through collaboration.

Gendlin's process of experience and the implicit combine with context to create meaning. These ideas and Plurality are considered deeply related.

The fragment "WHY I AM A PLURALIST" points out the connection between epistemic pluralism and linguistic Plurality. This is related to the epistemological pluralism of Plurality described in my research note.

The "Plurality Tokyo Day Memo" also presents the perspective that oriental values could be implemented. This leads to the relevance of Plurality to the Japanese cultural trends discussed in my research note.

The Plurality Tokyo Salon presents various perspectives on Plurality, including verbal Plurality and religious pluralism. These are related to the broad listening and epistemological pluralism of Plurality described in my research note.

In "What is Plurality," the concept proposed by Audrey Tang and E. Glen Weyl, which is the original source of Plurality, is introduced. This leads to the connection between Plurality and the ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita, as described in my research note.

extra info

generated: 2023-08-29 07:19

previous notes

🤖🔁Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita with Plurality

nishio.icon

Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita's ideas are related.

Plurality] in the cognitive sense exists at the intersection.

Philosophers avoid physics and psychology.

Japanese cultural tendency to emphasize consensus building over top-down decision making

Plurality's Broad Listening

Need to understand differences in cultural attitudes

Epistemological Pluralism of Plurality

Combined with context to create meaning

Plurality is considered to be deeply related to the ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita. Plurality is also a concept that requires understanding from diverse perspectives, such as broad listening and epistemological pluralism. Integrating these perspectives will provide a deeper understanding.

___BELOW_IS_LESS_INTERESTING___

In "Phenomenology as an Illogical Stage," it is noted that philosophers tend to avoid physics and psychology. This may be related to Gendlin's philosophy. In "Introduction to Gendlin's Philosophy," the whole picture of Gendlin's philosophy is elucidated.

In the Plurality and Polis Study Group, it was noted that a cultural tendency in Japan is to emphasize consensus building over top-down decision making. This is related to the broad listening aspect of Plurality.

In "Developing Japanese Cultural AI: Plurality for Global Deliberation," the need to understand differences in cultural ways of thinking is noted. This is related to Plurality's epistemological pluralism.

In light of the above, Plurality is deeply related to the ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita. Plurality is also a concept that requires understanding from diverse perspectives, such as broad listening and epistemological pluralism. Integrating these perspectives will provide a deeper understanding.

extra info

generated: 2023-08-25 07:17

previous notes

🤖🔁Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita with Plurality

🤖🔁Eugene Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita with Plurality

__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__

The ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita are related to Plurality in the cognitive sense. It is not communicated to those who have not had these experiences. Gendlin's experience process and the implicit are combined with context to create meaning. These ideas and Plurality are deeply related. In "WHY I AM A PLURALIST," the connection between epistemological pluralism and linguistic plurality is noted; Nishio's research note, "Plurality and the Polis Study Group," states that plurality, in the sense of diversity, may be a framework for discussion among people with interest or expertise in a particular subject Plurality may be a framework for furthering discussion among people with interests and expertise in a particular topic.

The fragment "Beyond the KJ Method" suggests a connection between Jiro Kawakita's KJ method and Plurality. The fragment "Plurality for Global Deliberation" emphasizes the importance of a broad understanding of the concept of plurality and its use.

Thinks deeply

The relevance of Gendlin's and Jiro Kawakita's ideas to Plurality needs to be considered more deeply. We should also explore specific ways in which experience and tacit knowledge that cannot be verbalized can be communicated through collaboration.

- What perspectives are needed to deeply understand Plurality?

- What are the specific methods of communicating tacit knowledge through collaboration?

- How can we share experiences that cannot be verbalized?

- How exactly should we understand the connection between epistemic pluralism and linguistic plurality as pointed out in "WHY I AM A PLURALIST"?

- How should we understand the Plurality framework described in Nishio's research note "Plurality and the Polis Study Group"?

In "Broad Listening," it is stated that "better consensus building" can be achieved by augmenting "the ability to recognize the opinions of the many." However, mastering the practical techniques of broad listening remains a challenge.

In "Kozaneba:Plurality" it is stated that "[Intelligence, not knowledge, is trusted as the environment changes faster. It also mentions "Plurality: Technology for Collaborative Diversity and Democracy - RadicalxChange.

In "Plurality and the Polis Study Group," it is stated that plurality, in the sense of diversity, may be a framework for further discussion among people with interests or expertise in a particular subject.

extra info

generated: 2023-09-16 07:14

__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__

The ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita are deeply related to Plurality. These ideas are about the transmission of tacit knowledge and the sharing of experiences that cannot be verbalized, which is possible through collaboration. In "WHY I AM A PLURALIST," the connection between epistemological pluralism and linguistic Plurality is noted; in Nishio's research note, "Plurality and the Polis Study Group," Plurality is considered a framework for further discussion among people with interest or expertise in a particular subject It is considered a framework for

The "Broad Listening" fragment states that the ability to recognize the opinions of many leads to better consensus building, which is related to the idea of Plurality. The "Kozaneba:Plurality" fragment states that intelligence, not knowledge, is trusted when the environment changes faster, which is related to the ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita. The "Plurality and Polis Study Group" fragment states that Plurality is a framework for further discussion, which relates to Nishio's research notes.

think deeply

A deeper consideration of the connection between the ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita and Plurality may lead to a new understanding of the transmission of tacit knowledge and the sharing of experiences that cannot be verbalized. We can also deepen our understanding of Plurality by considering in depth the connection between epistemological pluralism and linguistic Plurality as pointed out in WHY I AM A PLURALIST.

Plurality and the Sharing of Tacit Knowledge: An Exploration of the Ideas of Gendlin and Jiro Kawakita."

extra info

generated: 2023-10-16 07:09

---